Re: amule not in fedora?
Aurélien Bompard wrote:
> I did little investigation, and I can't see why amule
isn't in fedora?
Well, I can't remember exactly why, but I suppose it's now more for
historical reasons : it went into Livna at about the same time as
mldonkey, and at that time peer to peer was considered litigious
(Bittorrent wasn't in Fedora).
Huh? Fedora CVS has bittorrent branches going all the way back to RHL-8?
Paul.