http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396
--- Comment #47 from Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-23 21:05:11 ---
(In reply to comment #46)
I just edited the Configuration and the Contributors pages to give
more
emphasis to the following text (taken from
http://rpmfusion.org/AnnounceRepository):
"We have two separate software repositories:
* "free" for Open Source Software (as defined by the Fedora Licensing
Guidelines) which the Fedora project cannot ship due to other reasons
* "nonfree" for redistributable software that is not Open Source Software
(as defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines); this includes software with
publicly available source-code that has "no commercial use"-like
restrictions"
Because paintdotnet is not wholly licensed under an Open Source License (as
defined by the Fedora Licensing Guidelines) it must go to nonfree.
There is also the case:
A "free" package that depends on a "nonfree" package goes to the
"nonfree"
repo.
(This is not relevant to paintdotnet)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.