Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released
Hi!,
On Sex, 2014-09-26 at 07:24 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hi,
it seems like we had a bit of misunderstanding. I was under the
impression we are good to go with 2.4 in rawhide, and 2.2/2.3 for F20
is
what we were discussing.
yes , as we have cvs, to avoid confusions etc, we like first copy devel
to branch and after update devel, so devel keeps all story ...
I don't think it makes sense to roll back now, let's just
rebuild the
dependencies to minimise breakage time.
yes , I mean virtually roll back last commit and copy that to branch
F20 .
Until packages are signed and publish , no breakage happens , if you
disable repo needsign.
I think I should apply for the ffmpeg deps commit access moving
forward,
so that there are more people who can do the rebuild.
sorry don't understand what you mean here , but no worries we do the
best we can .
Meanwhile I'm very busy today, at least.
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.