2011/9/1 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>:
On Wednesday, 31 August 2011 at 03:06, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
wrote:
> 2011/8/10 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sunday, 31 July 2011 at 22:53, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
..
> >> That been said, we should probably update to this ABI in
F15 for x264
> >> as a preliminary step to continue to follow the 0.7.x ffmpeg branch
> >> there.
> >
> > I'll try to find some time to prepare the updates till the end of the week.
> >
>
> I don't want to rush anyone, but do you have any news on this?
Yeah, I went locally through all dependent packages on F-14 and patched them
where necessary, so F14 is ready to be pushed, but we need to do devel/F-16
first, then F-15 and then F-14.
Hi
Without further arguments, I still consider doing such update in F-14
as a violation of the fedora's
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
As we follow fedora's guidelines as we can with the exception of the
licensing, I just confirm that this policy applies to RPM Fusion too.
Quoting, "As a result, we should avoid major updates of packages
within a stable release"
So at the fist step, there is a need to have the change reverted, so
If another ffmpeg dependency in fedora break it's ABI for any reason,
we can rebuilt ffmpeg/x264 with the same version as the one already in
the repo.
Then I'm not necessarily against the idea, but I would like to listen
Pro/Con from other maintainers of multimedia packages, after something
has landed in f15 for some time.
Nicolas (kwizart)