Re: Updating F-20 to ffmpeg-2.2.10

W dniu 05.11.2014 o 03:55, Sérgio Basto pisze: > On Dom, 2014-11-02 at 08:02 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> W dniu 15.10.2014 o 07:42, Julian Sikorski pisze: >>> W dniu 15.10.2014 o 00:38, Sérgio Basto pisze: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained >>>>> branches list: >>>>> >>>>> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-September/162904.html >>>>> >>>>> Thus, if we ever rebase F-20, we should use 2.2 and not 2.3. >>>> >>>> The mode I like to work and to coordinate the mass rebuild for a stable >>>> branch (F-20), is first be test in devel . We have packages in devel, we >>>> test it for some time and when we can say that are stable , so we could >>>> *copy* to F-20 , another point was: mass rebuild was for ffmpeg/x264 , >>>> not only ffmpeg . >>>> So it is important have .specs for packages that compile in all Fedora >>>> releases. Having 2 trees, one for F20, other for devel , is just >>>> justified when is a very core package like udev or systemd ... , but >>>> for rpmfusion the point is other, maintainers are not aware ... >>>> So *theoretically* my solution was build ffmpeg 2.2 in devel, test it >>>> and copy to F-20 , but devel already have 2.3 so is not practical . >>>> >>>> Moving forward, just update "ffmpeg" on F20 seems to me acceptable , >>>> like you wrote "only libavfilter has a soname bump (snip) This means >>>> that we really only need to rebuild dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc." but we >>>> miss the test phase, we need guarantee that ffmpeg version was tested , >>>> any suggestion ? >>> >>> ffmpeg-2.2 was in devel between March and August. Moreover, the reason >>> why upstream picked it over 2.3 was that it is used by more downstream >>> distros: OpenSUSE, SUSE Enterprise and ROSA [1]. If we let it sit in >>> -testing for a bit longer than usual, I believe this will be enough. >>> >>>> >>>> Saying that and giving up mass rebuild ffmpeg/x264 for F-20, no need >>>> preserve devel as is and we can do the mass rebuild for ffmpeg 2.4 on >>>> devel , anything pending ? >>> >>> I don't think anything has changed since last time: dvbcut and >>> kmediafactory fail to rebuild, vlc needs a patch, everything else builds >>> fine. David Timms was working on making dvbcut work, but I have not >>> heard from him regarding whether he was successful. >>> >>>> >>>> BTW what packages (.spec) do you have ? that are different from stable >>>> branches to devel ? >>> >>> Only ffmpeg and mplayer. ffmpeg due to its numerous dependencies, and >>> mplayer because it is highly dependent on ffmpeg. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks and best regards, >>>> >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> [1] https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Downstreams >>> >> Where do we stand on this? > > I don't change must what I wrote : > "Update ffmpeg on F20 seems to me acceptable ,like you wrote "only > libavfilter has a soname bump ... This means that we really only need to > rebuild dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc." > > I think you should decide and we need authorization from kwizart . > > you don't want rebuild others deps right ? > > > cheers > I think we should go do it. 2.1 has not seen a release in months which means there might be unfixed security issues in it. I would only rebuild what we need to (dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc).