https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693
Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment #4 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> 2015-07-04 22:47:34 CEST ---
Hi,
Observation nº1
%setup -q and %setup -qn %{name}-%{version} do the same i.e. by default -n is
%{name}-%{version}
so you can use %setup -q
Observation nº2
About make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} you could use %make_install
I learn this today ,
| there are _two_ macros:
|
| 1. %makeinstall
| 2. %make_install
| The %makeinstall macro should be avoided, because it redefines many path
| variables that can lead to ugly side-effects.
| The %make_install macro does exactly what you want. Really do take a look at
| "rpm -E %make_install" to see what the macro does. It's there to make |
packaging easier.
Observation nº3 :
E: invalid-appdata-file /usr/share/appdata/girl.appdata.xml
why rpmlint is saying this ?
Observation nº4 :
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address in 17 files
please see [1] we should inform upstream that should correct the address in the
license.
For example [2]
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address
[2]
https://sourceforge.net/p/smb4k/tickets/40/
Even though, package APPROVED !
PS: on Package CVS request please just ask for: Branches: devel, F-20 is EOL,
F-21 is devel and F-22 doesn't exist
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.