Re: renaming sdlmame to mame

I agree with Andrea that the best way to do this is to make a new review request for mame. SDLmame can be safely Provides/Obsoletes by mame. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1593895, p7zip was Provides/Obsoletes by xz-lzma-compat. ��2010-01-17 17:45:24��"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; ������ >W dniu 17.01.2010 10:36, Andrea Musuruane pisze: >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> as of 0.136u1, sdlmame has been merged with the official version - i.e. >>> the SDL osd is now part of the MAME source. Thus, I'd like to request a >>> package rename. What's the correct procedure to do that? Is opening a >>> bug blocking the CVS admin one enough? >> >> I think the best way to do this is to make a new review request for >> Mame that will obsolete sdlmame. >> >> Bye, >> >> Andrea. >> >OK, the package overhaul could definitely use a review. As a related >question: is any of you using the intermediate sdlmame releases from >testing? These are going to be more painful to produce, it seems, so I'm >wondering if it's worth the effort. > >Julian >