https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3282
--- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm(a)greysector.net>
2014-07-14 10:42:38 CEST ---
Spec URL:
http://mokona.greysector.net/~rathann/rpmfusion/x265.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mokona.greysector.net/~rathann/rpmfusion/x265-1.2-2.fc20.src.rpm
* Sun Jul 13 2014 Dominik Mierzejewski <rpm(a)greysector.net> 1.2-2
- use version in source URL
- update License tag
- fix EOL in drag-uncrustify.bat
- don't link test binaries with shared binary on x86 (segfault)
(In reply to comment #4)
Why do we need to bundle the contributor agreement ? Or in others
words, we
don't
We don't need to, but I thought it's nice to have. Do you have a specific
objection?
Is %{_includedir}/x265_config.h multilibs compliant ?
Yes, it only contains the API version number, no arch-specific stuff.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.