Re: Non-redistributable packages: Skype, spotify, ...
On Qui, 2013-11-21 at 10:43 +0100, Simone Caronni wrote:
On 21 November 2013 10:22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
<dominik(a)greysector.net> wrote:
That's very nice and I've been actually doing the same thing,
but I
don't advertise my repository on the open Internet, because
distributing
Adobe's Flash plugin is against the licence. Or do you have a
special
licence from Adobe to do so?
Nope, no licence, in fact I'm planning to delete them after the lpf*
packages are in. I discovered Alec's lpf work while proposing the
packages to RPMFusion.
Hi, back to this point , no license doesn't mean you can. At least, is
what lawyers in my work said about other thing completely different.
So or we have permission or is not authorized, but I'm not a lawyer .
So I think we can call "Adobe's Flash plugin" not redistributable (by
omission in license ?! ).
Apart of this. RPMFusion have any other rule or restriction ? to not
ship this kind of software ? , because already have a repo ?
My idea was exactly not have to configure a dozen repositories, and
eventually an rpmfusion remix have it all out of the box .
--
Sérgio M. B.