Re: x264 soname change for rawhide

W dniu 14.07.2013 18:30, Sérgio Basto pisze: > On Dom, 2013-07-14 at 09:17 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com&gt; >> wrote: >> Hi, >> before update x264 to last stable commit >> >> We can analyze ABI changes with pkgdiff , >> abi-compliance-checker and >> abi-dumper >> >> pkgdiff >> x264-debuginfo-0.130-3.20130502git1db4621.fc20.i686.rpm >> x264-debuginfo-0.133-1.20130709git585324f.fc20.i686.rpm >> -details >> http://www.serjux.com/pkgdiff_reports/x264-debuginfo/0.130-3.20130502git1... >> http://www.serjux.com/pkgdiff_reports/x264/0.130-3.20130502git1db4621.fc2... >> >> >> Glad to see those tools are getting some use. I've got the official >> abi-dumper packages in testing. Feel free to give it karma to get it >> into stable faster. > > Ops I forgot that. Done . >> >> avidemux-2.6.4-5.fc20.src.rpm >> mythtv-0.26.0-9.fc20.src.rpm >> >> >> I don't have any updates planned for either of these packages so feel >> free to rebuild as needed or let me know when I need to kick them off. >> > About bump ffmpeg, Julian Sikorski is in better place to say, if we > should bump it or not. > But thinking about it, we just need bootstrap x264, when both (x264 and > ffmpeg) bump soname. In this case, I can just push x264 and after we > will see, if ffmpeg bumps or not , therefore I will bump x264 soname in > rawhide, if no one replies in short time ... ok ? > > Thanks, > I think we should bump. The sooner we do it, the more time we have to fix the breakage. I'll see how many packages rebuild and post the results here later today. Best regards, Julian