Re: Precedence for shadowing a monolithic Fedora package?
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 10:31 -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 23 August 2009 10:22:10 am Michel Salim wrote:
> The other concern is legality. I'm currently based in the US, so ... not
> sure how much I can do this myself.
As are many rpmfusion packagers ;).
True, that. I guess by the PGP precedence, since I only provide the
recipe for creating the package, and the build takes place on a server
overseas, it's kosher :P
OK, I created a review request for sonic-visualiser-freeworld here:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782
The corresponding Fedora package, that conflicts with this, will be
build when this one is approved. I plan to keep both in sync and build
updates concurrently.
Thanks,
--
Michel Salim
<SalimMA(a)fedoraproject.org>
GPG key ID: 78884778
IRC: hircus
Package Sponsor,
Fedora Project
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 197 bytes)