[Bug 527] Review request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527
--- Comment #89 from Zarko Pintar <zarko.pintar(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-21 22:53:03 ---
(In reply to comment #88)
Thanks Dan and Zarko. I think this is the best we can do for the time
being.
Thanks to you, too. :)
Zarko, it is a good practice to add a comment for each patch and additional
source file (if there's any), indicating what it is for and giving a link to
the upstream bugtracker and/or to the respective commit from the trunk. Could
you add these comments?
Yes I can, but I explained these patches in Changelog section of spec file:
====================================================
%changelog
* Wed May 20 2009 Zarko Pintar <zarko.pintar(a)gmail.com> - 0.4.0-3
- added linker patch to fix link motionest against libm
- added license patch to fix license info of MLT++
- set license of MLT devel subpackage to LGPLv2+
====================================================
I am removing your sponsorship request (bug #30) since you are already
sponsored in Fedora.
O, thanks....
Please reason your objection if you have any.
? What with PPC??
Can we build this package on PPC architecture or not, after last spec
intervention?
Or I must put
ExcludeArch: PPC, PPC64
? What with segfaults under F10?
Will we build only for F11, or...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.