Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

On Qua, 2014-10-01 at 19:38 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:51, Sérgio Basto pisze: >> On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>> W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze: >>>> On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>>> W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: >>>>>> On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild >>>>>>> coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is >>>>>>> not bad given the extent of API changes: >>>>>>> - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error: 'struct a52_ctx' has >>>>>>> no member named 'frame' >>>>>>> - dvbcut: lavfmuxer.cpp:63:57: error: 'av_new_stream' was not declared >>>>>>> in this scope >>>>>>> - kmediafactory: videofile.cpp:74:45: error: 'av_find_stream_info' was >>>>>>> not declared in this scope (mencoder needs to be rebuilt first) >>>>>>> - vlc: configure: error: libavcodec versions 56 and later are not >>>>>>> supported yet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Given that we are close to branching (?), what would be the good time to >>>>>>> do the rebuild? >>>>>> >>>>>> yes, I don't see any problem, I can do the mass rebuild of others >>>>>> packages, no problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> My question if we ever put this updates on F20 ? I'd like put it at >>>>>> least on update-testing. I can made a list of the packages, with >>>>>> ffmpeg / x264 dependencies, that should stay on update-testing for more >>>>>> time than usual, but is not my decision . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>> ffmpeg-2.4.1 has now been built. I will take care of rebuilding mplayer. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Julian >>>> >>>> Hi, please wait, let's wait to know if kwizart allow us to put ffmpeg >>>> 2.3.3 in F20, we think it is better and we have strong reasons , like >>>> explained in >>>> https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2014-September... >>>> >>>> Kwizart , do you allow this exception ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>> Just to be clear: I only pushed it to devel. F20 is still an open question. >> >> yes , but I want copy from devel to F20, the state of art , before >> upgrading to ffmpeg 2.4 , and it is more easier , clean etc , if just >> after this (update ffmpeg to 2.4) . ... >> >> >> Thanks, >> > If we ever decide to upgrade f20 (which I don't think we will given the > current fiasco), please do not overwrite the f20 spec with f21 one. I > suggest comparing the two and upgrading in parallel, something like git > cherry-pick. Hi , Julian , that is the point, this is cvs , we don't have "upgrading in parallel", I try rolling devel to branches and yes "overwrite the f20 spec" and what is in f20 spec is discard. Is the only rule of organization that we have .

But the main problem was and still is, lack of time , so I and kwizart (writing off-list) haven't much time next days and he point to try again (the mass rebuild) no this weekend but next weekend, meantime ffmpeg-2.3.3 still on devel (I think) . This is an ancient system so it give much work do all mass rebuild, see if we can make a new builder happen. Kwizart roll back to ffmpeg-2.3 , because though we haven't patches for vlc build against ffmpeg2-4 and lack of time of course .

Please be patient ...