[Bug 3043] Review request: lfp-flash-plugin - Adobe Flash Player package bootstrap

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 --- Comment #9 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-11-26 14:24:35 CET --- Fedora already handles such cases of duplicated binaries, the native one takes precedence. Please look here at my system where I have both installed: $ rpm -qa flash-plugin flash-plugin-11.2.202.327-1.fc19.i686 flash-plugin-11.2.202.327-1.fc19.x86_64 The following lists both packages: $ rpm -ql flash-plugin | grep bin /usr/bin/flash-player-properties /usr/bin/flash-player-properties But the one in bin is the correct arch one. $ file /usr/bin/flash-player-properties /usr/bin/flash-player-properties: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, stripped But more clean would be if I would split flash-player-properties in its own package. This way we can have the libs on both archs (i686 and x86_64) and the flash-player-properties only in your native arch. The purpose of flash-player-properties is to only write preferences in ~/.adobe. This would make everything look like normal libraries in Fedora, where you have the libs multiarch, and the binaries single arch. x86_64: flash-plugin-properties.x86_64 flash-plugin.x86_64 flash-plugin.i686 i686: flash-plugin-properties.i686 flash-plugin.i686 I'm doing this, will post it the updated package in a couple of hours (I'm at work!). Question for Alec: can't we just run lpf-setup-pkg two times, one for each arch in the %install section if the arch is x86_64? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.