Re: libdvdcss,again
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Rex Dieter wrote:
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> The answer might be trivial but I have a question: Can
someone explain me what is the difference between libdvdcss
and lame (or any of the other packages we have in rpmfusion
that is patent encumbered) from a legal perspective? Why is
lame OK, but libdvdcss is not?
The issue with lame is patents.
libdvdcss goes beyond that.
Can you elaborate? I think if people know the root of this conflict, they won't
iterate this debate over and over.
-Orcan