Re: Bug triage for f23

2015-11-19 12:59 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com&gt;: > Hi, > > On 15-11-15 08:12, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >  On Sáb, 2015-11-14 at 16:34 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > >  Hello, > > > > > > I'm still trying to focus on rfpkg/distgit infra tasks. But > > > there are > > > others tasks that can be worked on. > > > Many packages are not recent enought for f23 and might fail at > > > runtime for any reason. > > > > > Sorry something went wrong in previous emails, the final list is: > > rpmfusion-free bombono-dvd > > rpmfusion-free get-flash-videos > > rpmfusion-free libopenshot > > rpmfusion-free mixxx > > rpmfusion-free nailer > > rpmfusion-free oxine > > rpmfusion-free python-libopenshot > > rpmfusion-free qmmp-plugins-freeworld > > rpmfusion-free smc > > > smc just needs a rebuild against the F-23 buildroot > for the new boost found there. I've tested this locally, > just rebuilding the current f22 spec should be enough > (it will get a new dist-tag to make it newer). > > >  rpmfusion-free smc-music > > > This one just needs smc to be fixed. > > >  rpmfusion-free sox-plugins-freeworld > > rpmfusion-free xpra-codecs-freeworld > > rpmfusion-free z-push-zarafa > > rpmfusion-nonfree frogatto > > > frogatto just needs a rebuild against the F-23 buildroot > for the new boost found there. I've tested this locally, > just rebuilding the current f22 spec should be enough > (it will get a new dist-tag to make it newer). > > >  rpmfusion-nonfree gmameui > > rpmfusion-nonfree pdflib-lite-perl > > rpmfusion-nonfree pipelight > > rpmfusion-nonfree pipelight-common > > > The problem with pipelight is that it depends on > pipelight-selinux which was imported into Fedora, > but then later dropped as the rest of pipelight > ended up in rpmfusion. We should add a new > pipelight-selinux package to rpmfusion-nonfree > and import the latest src.rpm from: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=545078 > > To fix this, feel free to make me the maintainer > of pipelight-selinux (I'm a pipelight user). I don't get in which direction the wind blows currently WRT selinux policy packaging, but can't we have the pipelight-selinux merged back into pipelight package ? (keeping the -selinux package might be optional since obviously we are using selinux by default and even this package requires -selinux by default). Others rebuilt are progressing, are will be pushed in few hours.