On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 22:37 -0700, Jeff Mendoza wrote:
I elected to have openssl-freeworld and openssl-freeworld-devel
conflict with the regular packages. openssl-freeworld has the binary
openssl, this is not really needed, as the change is in the lib, and
the regular openssl binary will work with openssl-freeworld-libs.
openssl-freeworld-devel will conflict by installing the header files
in the usual place. I had to modify the pkg-config files in the devel
package to point to the new lib location.
Sorry, just wanting some clarification. Can the regular openssl binary
use the freeworld functions of openssl-freeworld-libs? If so, wouldn't
it make more sense to just not bother building openssl-freeworld and
only provide openssl-freeworld-libs?
Jonathan