[Bug 3805] Review request: cannonball - An Enhanced OutRun Engine

(In reply to Andrea Musuruane from comment #14) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13) > > - Include "BSD and Boost" licenses. > > Please remember the license tag is not a list of licenses found in the > source archive but it refers to the licenses of the contents of the *binary > RPM*: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field > > Moreover there is no BSD license in cannonball: "find . -name \* -type f > -exec grep "in source and binary forms" {} \;" does not return anything! BSD (unspecified) ----------------- cannonball-0.3/docs/license.txt ?? $ licensecheck -r * |grep BSL src/main/cannonboard/asyncserial.cpp: *No copyright* BSL (v1.0) src/main/cannonboard/asyncserial.hpp: *No copyright* BSL (v1.0) 'asyncserial.cpp' is directly involved during build, this is a Mixed Source Licensing Scenario: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario > > Therefore the resulting license of the binary RPM is the MAME license (i.e. > MAME + BOOST = MAME). Where is this reported this uniformity? However, there is no any reference to the 'MAME' license in the source archive; or am i wrong?