Re: Where we are and where do we what to go?
On 03.03.2009 08:27, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> - ideally a KDE spin as well, as I would like to prevent "RPM Fusion
> ignores KDE" fame; related: the name discussion, as the basic name of
> our first spin should leave room for other spins, hence your spins
> would need to be something like Omega Desktop or Omega Gnome afaics
It is already called as Omega Desktop.
Sounds really good, as it leaves room for other omega variants :-)
I don't have time to maintain another variant right now.
I didn't mean you to do that. That why I wrote "ideally" ;-)
We nevertheless IMHO once again should ask in public (blog and
spins-list maybe?) if somebody want to do a KDE spin with RPM Fusion
before we do one with Gnome -- then we can point users that complain
"why don't you hvae a KDE spin" there and tell them "nobody
volunteered".
> - ideally at least two people that take care of the spins that
review
> the work from each other a bit (IOW: we should at least basically
> review spins just like we review packages);
Again and I can only ask for feedback. What do I do if I don't get any?
Note that there is a "ideally" as well.
But again: We don't allow packages that haven't been reviewed. Why
should we allow spins that haven't been reviewed?
> - Fedora and RPM Fusion packages only
Does that mean livna libdvdcss cannot be included or that livna
repository cannot be enabled by default?
I'd say so, because the reasons for not including libdvdcss in a spin
are the same as for not including them in the repo.
Cu
knurd