Re: upnp and patents
Tanguy Eric wrote:
Hi, this soft make what i hate : integrate another project.
Mediatomb
integrate in the tarball a quite old version of libupnp (1.6.1) which is
BSD license (http://pupnp.sourceforge.net/). Fedora have libupnp 1.6.2
in stable and 1.6.3 is pending.
I hope this package will not interfere with fedora libupnp.
There is also libdlna (http://libdlna.geexbox.org/) which is an
extension of libupnp. Libdlna is patent encumbred because it uses ffmpeg
and is now part of livna.
In conclusion, Mediatomb uses pupnp software which is patent free but it
duplicates software ...
Thanks for your reply, can you please add your comment about Mediatomb using
its own private copy of libupnp to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733
Then the packager should patch is so that it will use the system version instead,
Thanks!
Regards,
Hans
Regards
Eric Tanguy
Le mercredi 02 janvier 2008 à 12:28 +0100, Hans de Goede a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I know that there has been some work done recently on some upnp packages for
> livna as there were some patent issues, today I stumbled over this review in
> Fedora:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733
>
> Can someone who knows a bit more check wether this piece of upnp software is
> patent stuff free?
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
> ___________________________________________
> Freeworld mailing list: Freeworld(a)livna.org
> http://livna.org/mailman/listinfo/freeworld
___________________________________________
Freeworld mailing list: Freeworld(a)livna.org
http://livna.org/mailman/listinfo/freeworld