http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789
--- Comment #10 from Yuri Timofeev <tim4dev(a)gmail.com> 2009-10-28 15:37:49 ---
http://webacula.sourceforge.net/files/moc.spec
http://webacula.sourceforge.net/files/moc-2.5.0-0.1.alpha4.fc10.src.rpm
I think my spec is better to be follow the requirements of Fedora ;)
However, I did not cope with this :
$ rpmlint -i moc-2.5.0-0.1.alpha4.fc10.i386.rpm
moc.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/mocp
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint -i moc-flac-2.5.0-0.1.alpha4.fc10.i386.rpm
moc-flac.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/moc/decoder_plugins/libflac_decoder.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
and so on.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.