[Bug 740] Review request: meka - Multi machine emulator for MS-DOS, MS-Windows and GNU/Linux

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740 --- Comment #18 from Göran Uddeborg <goeran(a)uddeborg.se&gt; 2010-12-06 18:53:24 --- True. The unused parts of the source package should not be included in the license field. But as I have understood it, one problem with "distributable" is that it is too vague. Maybe I have read in more than there is. But for me a license description like "Meka and non-commercial" or "BSD-like and non-commercial" would give me much more information than simply "distributable". Aha! Yes, that would not be such a good idea! A package (RPM package or original upstreams source package) can't have too many translations if the package maintainer is to maintain them himself! :-) But you do as you wish! Yes, it seems to be so. Ok. I'll put on my to-do-list to make a test case based on the code snippet in the reply, and send to the allegro team. I would like to hear your view on my comments on the license text, otherwise I'm happy with this version. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.