https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3443
--- Comment #12 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt(a)gmail.com> 2014-12-15 22:22:30 CET
---
(In reply to comment #11)
That doesn't mean that it's nice to trample on it just for
the sake of it.
Conflicts is the better solution, especially as you won't be conflicting with
anything from the repositories.
Agreed, this may cause some issues if users are using nautilus-dropbox and
rpmfusion. If yum see and update and grabs it from rpmfusion instead of dropbox
for nautilus, due to the provides line and rpmfusion by default being higher
priority repo, then we have a problem.
provides/obsoletes should only be used if the package conflicts but ultimately
has the same or newer replaced functionality. Dropbox's repo does not mess up
rpmfusion or fedora's repo's, so we should do the same to remain as compatible
as possible with fedora users.
See the following link for a list of repo's we try to be compatible with:
http://rpmfusion.org/FedoraThirdPartyRepos
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.