http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #70 from Alex Lancaster <alexl(a)users.sourceforge.net> 2010-01-25
07:03:47 ---
(In reply to comment #69)
Upstream here (theuni).
Hello. Good to hear from you!
It would be easier on us if a tracker ticket were created on our trac
for all
outstanding upstream issues (patches included), and linked to this page. Then
we have all fedora-related issues in one place for easy reference. Any
volunteers?
I have started a few already, but I'll start submitting the remaining patches
(which should hopefully be useful for all distros and even non-Linux OSes) to a
single trac ticket. Some of the patches may need additional modification
before applying to trunk, but they should be a starting point.
fwiw, as of ~2 days ago, fedora is compiling with no patches needed.
See here
for nightly build status and logs, not sure if it helps:
http://buildbot.xbmc.org/builders/fedora-nightly
That's good to hear. However, most of the patches aren't just to get xbmc to
compile (9.11 will "compile" very roughly with almost no patches), but are
fixes to ensure that compiler flags get passed around correctly, and to conform
to Linux specifications like the FHS and to use as many external system
libraries as possible (ideally configurable).
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.