[Bug 4112] Review request: rfpkg-minimal - Fork of fedpkg-minimal for RPM Fusion
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4112
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> 2016-07-09 20:05:27 CEST
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> - rfpkg-minimal-0.1.0/bin/rfpkg is licensed under GPLv3+
> LICENSE file is GPLv2 ??
That's exciting. This is an issue inherited from fedpkg-minimal that I didn't
notice... take a look at:
* https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedpkg-minimal.git/tree/LICENSE
* https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedpkg-minimal.git/tree/bin/fedpkg
The fedpkg-minimal spec claims the version is "GPLv2+".
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedpkg-minimal/sources/
I have filed https://fedorahosted.org/fedpkg-minimal/ticket/2 asking for
clarification. In the mean time, should we block on a response to that ticket
or assume GPLv2+ for now?
It looks to me like a venial error and those licenses are not even compatible.
I guess you should indicate the stricter license (GPLv2), waiting for a reply
from original author.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.