Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 21:00 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 12/22/2015 08:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> Hello >> >> On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 20:31 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet >>> on Fedora 22 and devel branch. Please, require a rebuild >>> (https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3821) as soon >>> as poss ible: >>> >>> faad2 libmpeg2 libdca twolame >> >> They are available in F23 at least : >> >> dnf repoquery --qf "%{sourcerpm} %{arch} %{repoid}" faad2 >> libmpeg2 libdca twolame | grep -v System >> >> faad2-2.7-6.fc22.src.rpm i686 rpmfusion-free >> faad2-2.7-6.fc22.src.rpm x86_64 rpmfusion-free >> libdca-0.0.5-9.fc22.src.rpm i686 rpmfusion-free >> libdca-0.0.5-9.fc22.src.rpm x86_64 rpmfusion-free >> libmpeg2-0.5.1-11.fc22.src.rpm i686 rpmfusion-free >> libmpeg2-0.5.1-11.fc22.src.rpm x86_64 rpmfusion-free >> twolame-0.3.13-4.fc22.src.rpm i686 rpmfusion-free >> twolame-0.3.13-4.fc22.src.rpm x86_64 rpmfusion-free >> > > fc22 ? > > Have you done an upgrade of Fedora? Or, does RPMFusion for F23 > provide mixed packages? Yes , sort of , when we rebuild the package it get fc23 tag , but those packages don't got rebuild so stay with f22 , it is common happens this

. Fedora have done a mass rebuild for all packages for this release so all packages should have fc23 tag but is an exception .

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWeoGUAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8V+IIAK88ICAwU93i76+vtaHNXmrc b4PBEBq8DEvkhs9GgJt+W+qgO3i5C5ECLPYogXHDwpQhRpcbKJ/UPzwAgWHDh8tS ep0LZlarTZjsS+EEmE6fbRuFOSC36PkdIDUST7qjLD3J6kOSh/RaSLKBKITtlG0I yVhHpxoS5fWfQJGJp/B7DDf2Cce10z2iXx8dac4AKIPCiHwFf+thgeNNDe5YKsaT C2KxQmdAwjYcploWCcgyBeYiYJTyeABNcLkkz3cZcBMp+6BWKwl4CWjyir+oTe2y mRyk1QKZSUZxmICMyx8yr86ptS4xM35VKO+Mmk4OfjiEf9/jRuLJyYlk36RCxLI= =72Ad -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----