http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467
--- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> 2009-03-29 21:08:25 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm opposed to have this packaged into rpmfusion, last upstream release is more
> than 10 years ago.
What's wrong with that provided the package has an active maintainer?
It may have tons of security issues and it isn't useful at all because it can
hardly display any current web page correctly.
> Any reason why this package should be usefull?
Browsing gopher?
So, why not providing gopher? or Netscape 3.x and 4.x?
I'm sorry but I agree with Nicolas. I don't think we should ship it.
Another reason why we shouldn't ship is because it can go in Fedora because the
license is fine:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.