2008/12/18 Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com>:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas Chauvet
<kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/12/18 Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com>:
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> 2008/12/18 Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name>:
>>>> Why do you want to use a different naming scheme than all the other mock
>>>> config files, which use this scheme:
>>>>
>>>> <name>-<release>-<arch>.cfg
>>> because the namespace is already taken.
>>
>> Assuming <name> would be "rpmfusion_free" who took it?
> What would be the namespace of the epel cfg files for rpmfusion then ?
Very right. what about:
rpmfusion_free
rpmfusion_free_epel
That 's a matter of choice. It doesn't seems more or
less clear.
Now as the work in done, the good news is
you can use whatever you want! (using a symlink , but on your own system)
Nicolas (kwizart)