[Bug 2736] Review Request: fdk-aac - Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2736 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|2 |3 Assignee|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |sergio(a)serjux.com |mfusion.org | --- Comment #26 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com&gt; --- fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 2736 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_nonfree no issues , just not sure is documentation aacDecoder.pdf and aacEncoder.pdf should be in devel package , at least in -doc sub package ... Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: fdk-aac-debuginfo-0.1.5-0.1.gita0bd8aa.fc26.x86_64.rpm fdk-aac-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license FDK-AAC 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- fdk-aac-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license FDK-AAC fdk-aac-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license FDK-AAC fdk-aac-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib fdk-aac.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fraunhofer -> Fraudster fdk-aac.x86_64: W: invalid-license FDK-AAC 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. invalid license is not an problem, only-non-binary-in-usr-lib usr/lib have a symlink correctly and other warnings can be ignored. fdk-aac.spec looks good , source field could be more simple : https://github.com/mstorsjo/%{name}/archive/%{commit0}/%{name}-%{shortcom... So just need clarify documentation and I will approve it . Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.