Nicolas Chauvet wrote on 20.10.2009 22:15:
2009/10/20 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info>:
> On 20.10.2009 12:36, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> 2009/10/20 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info>:
>>> Nicolas Chauvet wrote on 07.10.2009 01:08:
>>> Gstreamer builds in progress. Who takes care of mencoder, which afaik is
>>> a subpackage of mplayer, which you co-maintain these days afaics.
>>> Just wondering, because there is no "I will handle" there in above
list.
>>> Guess its likely just an oversight -- or shall I kick a rebuild and see
>>> what happens?
>> gstreamer builds has failed,
> ??? The three gstreamer packages we have were build and pushed earlier
> today.
Yep , i've just a five second looks, I haven't had much time at all.
So I just saw the first build that has failed.
>> they need to have x264 disabled as a temporary workaround then.
> One needed a workaround, but that had nothing to do with x264
> Or am I missing something?
that will be the workaround for others. mplayer and avidemux at least.
Any reason why you didn't answer this part of my mail?
> What about all the rebuilds against the new ffmpeg? Shall I just
bump
> and queue all the packages depending on it to see what breaks?
To be more precise: repoquery on rawhide yesterday complained 10 times
like this:
unresolved deps:
libavutil.so.49()(64bit)
That's something we should get fixed. Yes, normally we should leave that
to the package maintainers, but in my experience that often takes weeks
-- a quick "simply rebuild all the packages in question and see what
breaks" often fixes most of the issues quickly.
CU
knurd