2017-06-14 11:40 GMT+02:00 Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com>:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Btw, can we orphan lpf-skype can be orphaned ?
I would say so. Also, I would remove all lpf packages, lpf itself upstream
has not seen any new updates since 2015.
The problem is that we don't have a
long term solution for packages we
aren't allowed to redistribute.
About lpf-flash-plugin is probably to be removed also as you don't
seem to maintain and there are now updated packages for both npapi and
ppapi.
Personally I don't see the point to maintain that in our repos, best
is to use adobe repos directly and avoid to dedicate a maintainer to
do a duplicate work.
About lpf-spotify (or java-oracle, or msfonts), as we don't have a
permission to redistribute, it's still needed so far.
One could also ask spotify for a permission of redistribution.
Or we could also relax the policy as the spotify case isn't the same
as Adobe (which explicitly forbid public redistribution) and consider
that redistribution is permitted based on fact that none enforce the
redistribution restriction.
(there are arch packages in AUR at least
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spotify/)
The last solution is probably to advertise the online player instead:
http://open.spotify.com
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)