Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

>> Hi , Julian , that is the point, this is cvs , we don't have "upgrading >> in parallel", I try rolling devel to branches and yes "overwrite the f20 >> spec" and what is in f20 spec is discard. Is the only rule of >> organization that we have . > > I was not aware we have that rule. Until now, I was maintaining seperate > branches for ffmpeg and mplayer. I still believe that upgrading F-20 > independently is better as it preserves the history better. Case in point: rawhide ffmpeg has celt support disabled by default because the package has been retired in fedora. There is no reason to drop it in F-20. I have compared the F-20 and devel spec files, and the following changes are required if we decide to upgrade: - version bump to 2.3.x - rename README to README.md in %doc Please do not overwrite the F20 ffmpeg spec file. I think only makes sense for packages where the branches were kept at the same version at all times, which is not the case here.