http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #10 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2008-06-25 15:39:27 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Just a slight addition, a name change for qt between f8 & f9
qt in f9 is == qt4 in f8 hence somthing like this should do the trick:
I was going
to argue that it compiles just fine against f9 qt{==qt4}, but this
isn't the case. I didn't realize I had only qt3-devel installed, until:
$ rpm -q --provides qt-devel
libarthurplugin.so
libcontainerextension.so
libcustomwidgetplugin.so
libqt3supportwidgets.so
libtaskmenuextension.so
libworldtimeclockplugin.so
qt4-designer = 4.3.5-2.fc9
qt4-devel = 4.3.5-2.fc9
qt-devel = 1:4.3.5-2.fc9
$ rpm -q --provides qt3-devel
qt-devel = 1:3.3.8b-12.fc9
qt3-devel = 3.3.8b-12.fc9
Since dvbcut needs qt3, but both qt{3}-devel packages provide qt-devel, I
confirm that we need conditional Build-Requires.
updated spec:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut.spec
srpm:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/dvbcut/dvbcut-0.5.4-0.7.20080621svn13...
- add conditional build requires to ensure it builds against correct
qt[3]-devel
Is there a reviewer willing to formally review this package ?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.