Re: suns' java leagal issues

>>>> why we don't pack suns' java like them ? is there any legal issue ? > > and > >>> We build from source. this includes the jdk. hello! I'm talking about nonfree branch of rpmfusion that's why I'm not posting to fedora-devel rpmfusion contains re-distributable binary only stuff like nvidia and I hate java and I don't use it (unless when I'm forced to do that) so I don't know what bugs does open java have and what it can't run I have tried Sarf (http://sarf.sourceforge.net/) it's an opensource morphology engine written on Java and it worked but I can't type Arabic in text entry boxes and when I past them from other application it did not get them I'm not reporting this bug, my point is that some people needs java-sun not java-openjdk and we should give people the freedom to choose can any one tell me why ? which term of the EULA ... ? that we can't redistribute a well-packaged rpm for sun's java