Re: rpms/lastfm/F-9 lastfm.spec,1.1,1.2
On Tue August 5 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 30.07.2008 18:09, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> -desktop-file-install --vendor="livna" \
> +desktop-file-install --vendor="rpmfusion" \
Do we want to do that (here and everywhere)? Quoting from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
> * If upstream uses <vendor_id>, leave it intact, otherwise use fedora
> as <vendor_id>. * It is important that vendor_id stay constant for the
> life of a package.
>
> This is mostly for the sake of menu-editing (which bases off of .desktop
> file/path names).
Opinions?
Iirc it was proposed to drop the vendor_id or not to use it as a file prefix
in Fedora in the future. Therefore I would keep the vendor_id constant until
it is clear, whether it can be dropped.
Regards,
Till
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 827 bytes)