http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
--- Comment #164 from Alex Lancaster <alexl(a)users.sourceforge.net> 2010-03-26
20:46:21 ---
(In reply to comment #163)
Ok, I'm just going through the items that were [ - ] in #125.
[ X ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
We've gotten the worst offenders, and most of the rest are private
XBMC-specific libraries anyway.
[ X ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license
and meet the Licensing Guidelines
GoAhead is now stripped from the package, so I think we're good.
[ X ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL.
This has been fixed
[ X ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a
%{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with
desktop-file-install in the %install section.
This has been fixed
[ X ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
The reviewer hasn't tested this, but others have.
This package is APPROVED!
Thanks!
/me looks for fedora-review flag :)
According to:
http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#head-8354059095aca6ccb5494f9dac8815b732...
the equivalent is to switch the blocker bug from bug #2 to bug #4 (RF_ACCEPT).
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.