Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 25.09.2014 o 21:04, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: > 2014-09-25 20:44 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto > <sergio(a)serjux.com > <mailto:sergio@serjux.com>>: > > On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 20:33 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > 2014-09-25 19:27 GMT+02:00 Julian Sikorski > <belegdol(a)gmail.com > <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>>: > > W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze: > > > On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > > >> W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: > > >>> On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > > >>>> Dear all, > > >>>> > > >>>> ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have > > another rebuild > > >>>> coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have > > failed, which is > > >>>> not bad given the extent of API changes: > > >>>> - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error: > > 'struct a52_ctx' has > > >>>> no member named 'frame' > > >>>> - dvbcut: lavfmuxer.cpp:63:57: error: 'av_new_stream' was > > not declared > > >>>> in this scope > > >>>> - kmediafactory: videofile.cpp:74:45: error: > > 'av_find_stream_info' was > > >>>> not declared in this scope (mencoder needs to be rebuilt > > first) > > >>>> - vlc: configure: error: libavcodec versions 56 and > > later are not > > >>>> supported yet. > > >>>> > > >>>> Given that we are close to branching (?), what would be > > the good time to > > >>>> do the rebuild? > > >>> > > >>> yes, I don't see any problem, I can do the mass rebuild of > > others > > >>> packages, no problem. > > >>> > > >>> My question if we ever put this updates on F20 ? I'd like > > put it at > > >>> least on update-testing. I can made a list of the > > packages, with > > >>> ffmpeg / x264 dependencies, that should stay on > > update-testing for more > > >>> time than usual, but is not my decision . > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Best regards, > > >>> > > >> ffmpeg-2.4.1 has now been built. I will take care of > > rebuilding mplayer. > > > > > > > > Can we care about rebuilding all dependencies at the same time ? > > > yes of course , I will take care , > > but may I build all for new ffmpeg /x624 for F20 ? > > > SO I NAK the ffmpeg update in F-20 because the way the update was done > in Rawhide. > I don't want to hear about it. This is not acceptable not to have > coordinated the update. > PERIOD. > > > -- > - > > Nicolas (kwizart) In case this gets reconsidered at some point in the future: I have done a test rebuild of F-20 dependecies against ffmpeg-2.3.4, and all 37 have built correctly. Moreover, only libavfilter has a soname bump (please find rpmsodiff output attached). This means that we really only need to rebuild dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc. Best regards, Julian