Re: OpenCascade license?
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> wrote:
Richard Shaw píše v Po 31. 10. 2011 v 16:16 -0500:
> I'm taking a shot a building FreeCAD since I'm a CAD jockey in my day
> job and a "good" free CAD solution would be neat.
>
> It has OpenCascade as a major dependency, which uses their own
> license[1]. They claim it's LGPL-like. Would this have to go in free
> or non-free?
per Tom "Spot" Callaway and Red Hat Legal it is non-free, you should be
able to find the details in the archive of the fedora-legal mailing list
and/or OCC package review request in Fedora bugzilla.
OCC 6.3.0 is available from http://fedora.danny.cz/danny/ and it would
be nice to see OCC in a more official repo.
Well I took a look at your source package. Do you have any interest in
maintaining it in RPM Fusion?
The reason I ask is I noticed the large number of patches that I'm not
sure I'm even qualified to maintain. I see some minor things that need
to be changed in the spec but overall it's in very good shape.
Thanks,
Richard