Re: ffmpeg-0.11

On Qui, 2012-06-14 at 18:28 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2012-06-14 at 18:41 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> By scheduling the update for the next weekend, would you prefer me >> to >>> wait with with building ffmpeg until then? Or would you prefer me to >>> build it right away to give the maintainers more time to test? >> There is a certain number of package to build in order to bootstrap a >> ffmpeg update (likely x264) this probably needs maintainer >> coordination. >> (BTW, there is a RFE for x264 that needs to be adressed about 10bit >> option) > RFE: build an alternate x264 for 10bit option > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2227 > > I will see what I can do this weekend ... , I opened to suggestions x264 updated in rawhide, I add other build with --bit-depth=10 and just install /usr/lib(64)/libx26410b.so.124 and /usr/lib(64)/libx26410b.so (devel package). So it is harmless. I don't know if you need more files ... Just to certify that I'm not wrong , we should use bootstrap option ? since we bump x264 from 0.120 to 0.124, we should built it with bootstrap option and wait for ffmpeg rebuild and after that we remove bootstrap option to enable x264 build with libavformat (which depends on ffmpeg) and gpac, right ? Thanks,