[Bug 248] Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
--- Comment #9 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-02 10:45:46 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Binaries should not be stripped, e.g. to distribute as designed.
They aren't stripped at this time, as %define debug_package %{nil}
is used.
There is another superior feature of the shareware rar/unrar. It
handles the
encryption and the authenticity verification (registered) unlike the free
source unrar.
Therefore you should package the unrar binary as well and handle it
in
alternatives with higher priority over the free source unrar.
It would seems
accurate. But from my needs, maybe the alternative will have to
cover the version as dvdrip seems to request rar/unrar 2.xx (and not 3.xx).
So as i don't think we can use alternative on a rename base (rar-> rar-3.80),
maybe we will have to use it on a path name base. (/usr/bin/rar ->
/usr/bin/rar-3.xx/rar )
Another good feature would be to package more sfx modules for other
OSs, mainly
the most frequent one ( :-D ).
I'm not well aware of what sfx modules are
usefull for (would just use rar from
dvdrip actually) . I'm opened to suggestions here.
If you want to help implementing the above, please, feel free..I will lack some
time on the rar/unrar area until few weeks...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.