http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
--- Comment #9 from Chris Nolan <chris(a)cenolan.com> 2008-10-30 22:55:32 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> What is the reasoning behind using two SRPMs when one seems to
do the job?
Two reasons:
(1) It prevents that the package with that contains the userland part gets
rebuilt everytime new kmods get build
(2) The userland packages doesn't get built for i586 and i686
[...]
Thank you Thorsten, that makes sense.
I've repackaged it up into two separate SRPMs and fixed a couple of problems
along the way:
broadcom-wl:
http://www.cenolan.com/fedora9/broadcom-wl/broadcom-wl.spec
http://www.cenolan.com/fedora9/broadcom-wl/broadcom-wl-5.10.27.6-1.fc9.sr...
wl-kmod:
http://www.cenolan.com/fedora9/broadcom-wl/wl-kmod.spec
http://www.cenolan.com/fedora9/broadcom-wl/wl-kmod-5.10.27.6-3.fc9.src.rpm
Here are the rpmlint results:
[cnolan@macbook SPECS]$ rpmlint broadcom-wl.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[cnolan@macbook SRPMS]$ rpmlint broadcom-wl-5.10.27.6-1.fc9.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[cnolan@macbook noarch]$ rpmlint broadcom-wl-5.10.27.6-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[cnolan@macbook SPECS]$ rpmlint wl-kmod.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[cnolan@macbook SRPMS]$ rpmlint wl-kmod-5.10.27.6-3.fc9.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[cnolan@macbook x86_64]$ rpmlint kmod-wl-5.10.27.6-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm
kmod-wl.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[cnolan@macbook x86_64]$ rpmlint
kmod-wl-2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64-5.10.27.6-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm
kmod-wl-2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation
kmod-wl-2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized wl kernel
module(s) for 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64
kmod-wl-2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/lib/modules/2.6.26.6-79.fc9.x86_64/extra/wl/wl.ko
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Best
Chris
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.