Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

Hi, On Ter, 2014-10-07 at 08:02 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> > Please be advised that 2.3 was recently removed from the maintained > branches list: > > https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2014-September/162904.html > > Thus, if we ever rebase F-20, we should use 2.2 and not 2.3. The mode I like to work and to coordinate the mass rebuild for a stable branch (F-20), is first be test in devel . We have packages in devel, we test it for some time and when we can say that are stable , so we could *copy* to F-20 , another point was: mass rebuild was for ffmpeg/x264 , not only ffmpeg . So it is important have .specs for packages that compile in all Fedora releases. Having 2 trees, one for F20, other for devel , is just justified when is a very core package like udev or systemd ... , but for rpmfusion the point is other, maintainers are not aware ... So *theoretically* my solution was build ffmpeg 2.2 in devel, test it and copy to F-20 , but devel already have 2.3 so is not practical . Moving forward, just update "ffmpeg" on F20 seems to me acceptable , like you wrote "only libavfilter has a soname bump (snip) This means that we really only need to rebuild dvdstyler, mpv and xbmc." but we miss the test phase, we need guarantee that ffmpeg version was tested , any suggestion ?

Saying that and giving up mass rebuild ffmpeg/x264 for F-20, no need preserve devel as is and we can do the mass rebuild for ffmpeg 2.4 on devel , anything pending ?

BTW what packages (.spec) do you have ? that are different from stable branches to devel ?

Thanks and best regards,