Re: libdvdcss,again
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
I really hope this is the last time this is asked.
I only caught the last bits (just the last 2-3 months) of this ongoing discussion.
The answer might be trivial but I have a question: Can someone explain me what is the
difference between libdvdcss and lame (or any of the other packages we have in rpmfusion
that is patent encumbered) from a legal perspective? Why is lame OK, but libdvdcss is
not?
Cheers,
Orcan