http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527
--- Comment #31 from Zarko Pintar <zarko.pintar(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-17 16:07:18 ---
and what will set the LADSPA_PATH during runtime? No, just patch (or sed) it
up, and there won't be no worries.
My mistake...
but if I put in spec some like this:
%post
/sbin/ldconfig
export LADSPA_PATH=%{_libdir}/ladspa
Then, will yum after installing package execute this export line and setup
LADSPA_PATH to correct value?
But if you want patch, I'll make a patch, but before them I must know how to
solve this multilib path (Currently I do not have enough knowledge about
multilibs :( ) (Nobody is perfect :) )
Please describe me the steps to get this rpmlint warning, with that line
removed.
After building package with mock and checked packages under mocsk's result dirs
with rpmlint, and without execstack line, I'm getting this warning in i386
package:
mlt.i586: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/mlt/libmltgtk2.so
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.