http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127
David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dtimms(a)iinet.net.au
--- Comment #5 from David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> 2010-04-06 00:08:18 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
* Remove repositories which provides non-open-source software only.
* Remove Livna repository.
* Remove ATrpms repository.
Hi Homer,
I'm pretty sure that messing with people's software repository configuration is
not acceptable in a package. (I haven't taken a look at how this was achieved
in this package).
An example why this might be bad: eg user installs package A from (removed
repo), that requires current versions of libraries. They then install this
package, which disables the repo. Fedora offers security patches for the libs
that package A requires (specific version). Now the user can never successfully
update to the security fixed packages because yum sees that the installed
package would break.
ps. I haven't performed a normal review.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.