Re: ffmpeg-2.4 released

W dniu 25.09.2014 o 20:51, Sérgio Basto pisze: > On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 19:27 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >> W dniu 25.09.2014 o 17:26, Sérgio Basto pisze: >>> On Qui, 2014-09-25 at 07:47 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>> W dniu 21.09.2014 o 23:20, Sérgio Basto pisze: >>>>> On Dom, 2014-09-21 at 19:03 +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> ffmpeg-2.4 was released recently which means we have another rebuild >>>>>> coming up. I have done a test and only 4 packages have failed, which is >>>>>> not bad given the extent of API changes: >>>>>> - alsa-plugins-freeworld: pcm_a52.c:101:45: error: 'struct a52_ctx' has >>>>>> no member named 'frame' >>>>>> - dvbcut: lavfmuxer.cpp:63:57: error: 'av_new_stream' was not declared >>>>>> in this scope >>>>>> - kmediafactory: videofile.cpp:74:45: error: 'av_find_stream_info' was >>>>>> not declared in this scope (mencoder needs to be rebuilt first) >>>>>> - vlc: configure: error: libavcodec versions 56 and later are not >>>>>> supported yet. >>>>>> >>>>>> Given that we are close to branching (?), what would be the good time to >>>>>> do the rebuild? >>>>> >>>>> yes, I don't see any problem, I can do the mass rebuild of others >>>>> packages, no problem. >>>>> >>>>> My question if we ever put this updates on F20 ? I'd like put it at >>>>> least on update-testing. I can made a list of the packages, with >>>>> ffmpeg / x264 dependencies, that should stay on update-testing for more >>>>> time than usual, but is not my decision . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>> ffmpeg-2.4.1 has now been built. I will take care of rebuilding mplayer. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Julian >>> >>> Hi, please wait, let's wait to know if kwizart allow us to put ffmpeg >>> 2.3.3 in F20, we think it is better and we have strong reasons , like >>> explained in >>> https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2014-September... >>> >>> Kwizart , do you allow this exception ? >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >> Just to be clear: I only pushed it to devel. F20 is still an open question. > > yes , but I want copy from devel to F20, the state of art , before > upgrading to ffmpeg 2.4 , and it is more easier , clean etc , if just > after this (update ffmpeg to 2.4) . ... > > > Thanks, > If we ever decide to upgrade f20 (which I don't think we will given the current fiasco), please do not overwrite the f20 spec with f21 one. I suggest comparing the two and upgrading in parallel, something like git cherry-pick.