Re: ffmpeg-0.11

W dniu 12.06.2012 23:55, Julian Sikorski pisze: > W dniu 27.05.2012 12:46, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: > >> 2012/5/27 Julian Sikorski : >> >>> Dear RPM Fusion developers, ffmpeg-0.11 was released a few days >>> ago. Do you think we should try to push it to Fedora 17? >> I'm not against having it as an update, but: - Is the ABI the same >> ? >> - does dependants package build fin ? - Can we make the update to >> settle in rawhide first, and then to evaluate the update in F-17 >> (if >> relevant) ? I also wonder if it won't be more relevant to wait for >> a >> new 0.10.x release that might be done at a later point. Nicolas >> (kwizart) > After finally getting CVS access back I was able to finish the > rebuild. Results are as follows: out of 34 dependencies, 5 worked > out > of the box, one required libquicktime to be built first, one needed > BR > fix and mplayer worked when updated to 1.1. I think we should still > go > on and let the maintainers fix their packages. Details: > mplayer updated to 1.1 works, did not check otherwise > picard-freeworld > requires vlc qmmp-plugins-freeworld failed vbam failed vlc failed: > free: command not found wxsvg worked xbmc failed > xine-lib-extras-freeworld failed xmms2-freeworld failed Regards, > Julian To be clear: go on in rawhide and then see where we stand once everything is patched up. Julian