Re: qtractor moved to Fedora

Le 20 mai 2012 23:24, "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at <mailto:kevin.kofler@chello.at>> a écrit : Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > But in this case I wonder why not to simply override the no > replacement policy ? At least a good reason would need to be provided > for still obeying this policy. Users in countries which obey software patents might not want their patent- compliant package silently replaced by a patent-encumbered one. It doens't hold, RPM Fusion free is fully made of patent encumbered components by design. Which make me wonder if we really need to requires the rpmfusion-free-release from the rpmfusion-nonfree-release from patent point of view. My point is that people using mp3 enabled qtractor from current RPM Fusion shouldn't received a disabled package either. Nicolas (kwizart)