[Bug 1931] Review request: audacious-plugins-nonfree - Audacious media player plugins with non free dependencies
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1931
--- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com> 2011-09-25 16:51:43
---
Hi,
(In reply to comment #4)
> Since c offers a "better" audacious-plugins-sid,
wouldn't it be better to
> obsolete it instead, I really like to avoid conflicts
> where ever possible. The question then becomes Obsolete which version I guess
> anything < %{version} of audacious-plugins-nonfree?
Is it appropriate for a package in nonfree to Obsolete a package in Fedora or
free?
I guess people who really don't want any non-free stuff will simply not enable
the non-free repository (enabling that requires user interaction and is a
separate step from enabling the regular rpmfusion repository).
Those people who have both audacious-plugins-sid installed and the
rpmfusion-nonfree repo's enabled likely want the best sid plugin there is,
which is the one using the non free libsidplay 2
This is all IMHO, I understand others may feel differently about what is best
here and I'm open to discussion.
Regards,
Hans
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.