[Bug 3043] Review request: lfp-flash-plugin - Adobe Flash Player package bootstrap

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-11-25 22:59:52 CET --- - Why an epoch is set ? - Where is the mention that the produced package will either be i686 or x86_64 and not ppc/arm or else ? - Also the adobe repository allow to install the i686 version along with the x86_64. Is it still possible to do so with lfp? How ? - The license of the wrapper is MIT, but the resulting usable package will be Proprietary. I think we shouldn't abuse anyone with the license of the "wrapped" spec file. Specially MIT is the default license for spec files unless stated otherwise. But MIT from the spec was never added in the computation of the license field for all packages in the fedora collection. - Flash on linux, is unmaintained buggy ? Should we still advertise that, even by improving the packaging ? This will only hide misery. - I'm keen to have any patch to review for nvidia packaged driver - but that's unrelated to this bugreport ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.